The newest Trump monument disobeys the biblical commandment to ‘flee from idolatry’
It is a story found in the Torah, the Bible and the Koran: Moses comes down from Mount Sinai with the Ten Commandments, only to find the Israelites worshipping a golden calf. He then angrily destroys it and the worshippers are punished for the sin of idolatry.
After a 22-foot gold-covered statue of President Donald Trump raising his fist, known as the “Don Colossus,” was dedicated at the Trump National Doral Miami last week, Trump ally and evangelical pastor Mark Burns defended it in a long and meandering post on X.
“Let me say this plainly: this is not a golden calf,” he wrote. “We worship the Lord Jesus Christ and Him alone. This statue is not about worship. It is about honor.”
But the biblical symbolism here is impossible to ignore. When the Israelites fashioned the golden calf, the sin was not merely that they made an object of gold. It was that they transferred reverence, trust, identity and obedience from God to something political, visible, immediate and emotionally satisfying.
They wanted certainty they could see and touch. They wanted a figure around which to rally. They wanted strength more than holiness.
I spent a few years in Augustinian formation studying scripture, tradition and the moral demands of faith. And I know enough to recognize idolatry when it is staring at me with a face plated in gold.
Let’s not pretend this is complicated theology. It is not. You cannot stand in front of a golden statue built to glorify a political leader, surround it with preachers, bless it, praise it and then act shocked that the rest of us might consider it a false idol. The Apostle Paul was explicit: “Flee from idolatry.” It can’t get any simpler than that.
Pastor Mark Burns defends ‘Don Colossus’ statue of Trump May 11, 2026 / 02:38
That is why the image of pastors “blessing” a golden statue of a political leader is not just unsettling to secular Americans, but also to Christians, Jews and Muslims across theological and political lines.
Even if those involved insisted they were blessing the man or praying over the country rather than worshiping an idol, symbolism matters profoundly in Scripture. The Bible is saturated with warnings not merely against literal idol worship, but against confusing earthly power with divine authority.
From Exodus to 1 Corinthians, which is the other Corinthian Trump doesn’t know about, Christian Scripture reinforces one of the central pillars of Christianity: the rejection of idolatry and the command to worship God alone. Exodus 20:3-5 and Leviticus 26:1 explicitly forbid the creation and worship of idols, establishing that devotion belongs solely to God. Psalm 115:4-8 mocks idols as powerless objects made by human hands, warning that those who worship them become spiritually hollow themselves. In the New Testament, the warning continues unchanged. John 5:20-21 closes with the direct instruction: “keep yourselves from idols.”
Modern Trumpism has blurred the line between political loyalty and spiritual submission so completely that some pastors now sound less like ministers of the Gospel and more like court prophets protecting the fragile ego of an ancient king.
This is where the American church should be alarmed. Not because of one ridiculous statue, but because too many religious leaders have traded moral authority for proximity to power. Parts of Christianity increasingly measure spiritual success through political conquest. Leaders are defended not by the standards of the Gospel, but by whether they “fight for us.” Moral failings are excused if the leader delivers judicial appointments, cultural victories or partisan revenge. Political identity becomes fused with religious identity until criticism of a politician is interpreted as an attack on the faith itself.
That fusion is spiritually dangerous because it transforms Christianity from a transcendent moral witness into a tribal instrument. And once that happens, scripture itself becomes selective. Passages about humility, welcoming the stranger, truthfulness, mercy, peacemaking and care for the poor recede into the background. In their place emerges a Christianity centered on grievance, images of strength, spectacle and enemies.
The golden statue is more a symptom than the problem. The concern here is not whether the “blessing” of Don Colossus technically qualifies as a “golden calf.” It is whether Christians can still distinguish between the worship of God and the worship of power clothed in religious language. The golden statue becomes symbolic not because Christians literally believe it is divine, but because it reveals what many now believe Christianity is for.
Once a faith becomes unable to criticize its own idols, it ceases to be prophetic. It becomes court religion — a chaplaincy to power rather than a witness to truth. If pastors spend their time defending images of Trump rather than defending the teachings of Christ, something is deeply wrong in the soul of American Christianity.
Donald Trump Wants to Open Fort Knox to Personally Ensure the U.S.' Gold Reserve, Worth Nearly $700 Billion, Is Still There
"I wonder if they left the gold in Fort Knox because they steal a lot," the president said Sunday
President Donald Trump (left); Fort Knox (right).Credit :
President Donald Trump still wants to conduct an audit of Fort Knox, stating that he wants to ensure that the nation’s $700 billion worth of gold is still secure.
During a Sunday, May 10, appearance on Full Measure with Sharyl Attkisson, the president, 79, answered a viewer's question about his comments from last year about wanting to pay a visit to the U.S. Army installation in Kentucky to inspect the gold reserve there.
"We wanted to go and knock on the door of Fort Knox — a very thick door — and to see whether or not we have any gold in there," Trump said, adding that he "played with" the idea of an audit.
"I wonder if they left the gold in Fort Knox because they steal a lot," he continued, but did not clarify who would have supposedly stolen the gold reserves.
US President Donald Trump during an executive order signing ceremony in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, DC, US, on Thursday, April 30, 2026.
Aaron Schwartz/CNP/Bloomberg via Getty
Trump was then asked if there was a need to examine the gold reserves.
"Well, I don’t know," he responded. "I do want to go to Fort Knox some time. I want to see if the gold is there, which I'm sure it will be."
Trump's comments come more than a year after he and former Department of Government Efficiency leader Elon Musk expressed an interest in looking into the nation's gold supply.
"A live tour of Fort Knox would be awesome … is the gold there or not?" Musk said during a February 2025 appearance on The Joe Rogan Podcast, per ABC News. "They say it is—is it real? Or did somebody spray paint some lead?"
"I do want to go to Fort Knox some time. I want to see if the gold is there, which I'm sure it will be," the president said.
Getty
Trump also brought up the gold supply at the time after being asked about Musk's DOGE efforts.
"We have found hundreds of billions of dollars of fraud so far. And we've just started. We're actually going to Fort Knox to see if the gold is there, because maybe somebody stole the gold. Tons of gold," Trump said in February 2025, according to pool reports.
"You grew up hearing about Fort Knox. You can't get in. You can't even see it. Nobody sees it. You go there and the place is dry," Trump said during another instance in February 2025, adding that he plans to "open the doors to Fort Knox."
Never miss a story — sign up for PEOPLE's free daily newsletter to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories.
The United States Bullion Depository at Fort Knox, located outside Louisville, Ky., stores 147.3 million fine troy ounces of gold and has been functional since 1937, according to the U.S. Mint.
"The Fort Knox gold is held as an asset of the United States at a book value of $42.22 per ounce," the Mint explains, meaning that the gold is valued at nearly $700 billion. "...The only gold removed has been very small quantities used to test the purity of gold during regularly scheduled audits. Except for these samples, no gold has been transferred to or from the Depository for many years."
THE STRIKE THAT SHOOK TEHRAN: INSIDE THE ESCALATING FEARS OF A WIDER MIDDLE EAST CONFLICT

The skies above Tehran erupted into flames as reports of a devastating aerial assault sent shockwaves across the Middle East and triggered a wave of global alarm. What initially appeared to be another night of rising regional tension quickly transformed into a scenario that analysts say could mark one of the most dangerous escalations involving Iran in recent years.
Images and dramatic footage circulating online appeared to show massive explosions tearing through sections of the Iranian capital while military aircraft roared overhead. Thick black smoke climbed into the skyline as panic spread rapidly across social media platforms, fueling fears of a direct confrontation capable of reshaping the region overnight.
Although many of the circulating visuals and videos are linked to military simulation content and remain unverified, the reaction surrounding the reports highlights just how fragile the geopolitical climate around Iran has become.

A NIGHT OF FIRE AND CONFUSION OVER TEHRAN
According to rapidly spreading online claims, heavily armed attack aircraft allegedly launched coordinated strikes against strategic targets inside or near Tehran, igniting widespread speculation about a potential military escalation involving the United States and Iran.
Witnesses quoted across social platforms described hearing multiple explosions followed by air raid sirens and heavy anti-aircraft activity. Several videos appearing online showed fiery blasts lighting up urban areas while crowds scrambled through smoke-filled streets.

As the footage spread globally, confusion intensified over what was real, what was simulated, and what may have been intentionally amplified through online disinformation networks.
Military analysts quickly noted that some viral clips resembled highly realistic combat simulations often created using advanced military gaming platforms such as ARMA 3, a technology increasingly used online to produce cinematic war content capable of misleading audiences during real-world crises.
Still, the intensity of the reaction exposed deep anxieties surrounding the possibility of a direct military confrontation involving Tehran.

WHY THE A-10 WARTHOG REMAINS A SYMBOL OF FEAR
Central to many of the circulating narratives was the A-10 Thunderbolt II, better known globally as the “Warthog,” one of the most iconic close-air-support aircraft ever developed by the United States military.

Known for its devastating firepower, low-altitude attack capability, and massive GAU-8 Avenger rotary cannon, the A-10 has long been associated with overwhelming battlefield destruction. Its unmistakable reputation has made it a powerful symbol in military media, simulations, and online war narratives.

In recent years, realistic military simulations featuring the aircraft have gained enormous popularity online, often blurring the line between fictional combat scenarios and actual geopolitical events.
The latest viral claims involving Tehran demonstrate how quickly highly cinematic military content can trigger international speculation, especially during periods of heightened tension involving Iran and Western powers.

THE REGION REMAINS ON EDGE
Even though no verified evidence currently confirms a direct American airstrike on Tehran, the rapid spread of such reports reflects the dangerous atmosphere dominating the Middle East today.
Iran remains deeply entangled in multiple regional flashpoints involving proxy conflicts, maritime tensions, missile development, cyber operations, and disputes with Israel and Western governments. Military analysts warn that even false reports or misinterpreted footage can increase instability by influencing public perception, political rhetoric, and military readiness.

In the hours following the viral claims, observers reported increased online activity connected to Iranian state media, regional military monitoring channels, and international intelligence communities attempting to assess the authenticity of the circulating footage.
Security experts caution that information warfare has become a major component of modern geopolitical conflict, where perception can often escalate tensions nearly as rapidly as actual military action.

INFORMATION WARFARE IS NOW PART OF THE BATTLEFIELD
The incident surrounding the viral Tehran strike narrative demonstrates a growing global challenge: distinguishing reality from sophisticated digital warfare content.
Modern simulation platforms now produce visuals so realistic that millions of viewers struggle to separate fictional military scenarios from actual combat footage. During periods of geopolitical instability, these videos can spread across social media at extraordinary speed, amplifying fear and confusion before official verification becomes available.

Experts warn that viral military misinformation can influence markets, trigger diplomatic reactions, and even impact military calculations in real time.
The Tehran strike narrative spread rapidly because it tapped directly into existing global fears surrounding Iran, regional instability, and the possibility of large-scale escalation in the Middle East.

GLOBAL MARKETS AND GOVERNMENTS WATCH CLOSELY
As the claims gained traction online, energy markets and geopolitical analysts closely monitored developments for signs of possible escalation.
Any genuine military confrontation involving Tehran could have enormous consequences for global oil supply routes, shipping corridors, and regional security alliances. The Strait of Hormuz remains one of the world’s most strategically critical maritime chokepoints, and instability involving Iran often causes immediate volatility in energy markets.

International governments responded cautiously, emphasizing the importance of verification before drawing conclusions about the circulating reports.
Still, intelligence agencies around the world continued reviewing available footage and monitoring regional communications channels amid concern that even fabricated narratives could inflame tensions.

A DIGITAL ERA WHERE FICTION CAN TRIGGER REAL FEAR
The viral reaction to the alleged strike on Tehran highlights how modern conflict now unfolds across both physical and digital battlefields simultaneously.
In previous decades, military escalation depended largely on confirmed troop movements, official announcements, or verified battlefield activity. Today, a single realistic video clip or dramatic headline can dominate global attention within minutes.
For audiences worldwide, distinguishing between verified reporting, simulation content, propaganda, and misinformation has become increasingly difficult.
The Tehran strike story serves as another reminder that in the age of hyper-realistic digital media, perception itself can become a geopolitical force.
THE WORLD REMAINS FIXED ON IRAN
Whether the circulating reports prove entirely fictional, partially accurate, or connected to broader regional tensions, one reality remains undeniable: the Middle East continues operating under extraordinary pressure.
Iran’s strategic importance, combined with ongoing proxy conflicts and fragile international relationships, means that even rumors of military escalation immediately attract global scrutiny.
For now, officials continue urging caution while analysts attempt to separate fact from speculation.
But the explosive reaction surrounding the Tehran strike narrative has already demonstrated how quickly fear, uncertainty, and geopolitical tension can spread in a world where information moves faster than verification.
And in today’s Middle East, sometimes the perception of war can become almost as dangerous as war itself.



:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc():focal(728x244:730x246):format(webp)/Donald-Trump-fort-knox-051026-0a1f71d5397c45c3b0147e7643984911.jpg)
:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc():focal(740x430:742x432):format(webp)/Donald-Trump-Oval-Office-April-2026-043026-ef94ccdf75ba410c8378a85c5179a258.jpg)
:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc():focal(999x0:1001x2):format(webp)/fort-knox-051026-4b1c6875777b4137b7118579d55c4b63.jpg)